• Users Online: 163
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 112-121

Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma scores in asthmatic patients with and without allergic rhinitis

1 Department of ENT, , Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
2 Department ofInternal Medicine, , Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
3 Department of Clinical Pathology, ALMatarya Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
4 Department ofOtolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Tamer Youssef
Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Abbasyea Square, Cairo 11566
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/1012-5574.133210

Rights and Permissions

Background Allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma are chronic inflammatory conditions that frequently coexist, both with hallmark eosinophilia. Immunotherapy is an established treatment for allergic diseases. Noninjective routes for immunotherapy, such as the sublingual route, are thought to be valuable therapeutic options for respiratory allergy. Aim of the study In the present study, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using multiple allergens was administered to allergic asthmatic patients with and without allergic rhinitis aiming to evaluate the clinical efficacy of and changes in allergen-specific antibodies during SLIT and its effect on control of asthma severity and nasal allergy scores. Patients and methods The study included 40 patients in two groups: group I included 20 asthmatic patients and group II included 20 patients with both proven bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis. All patients were subjected to assessment of the status of asthma and hence its degree of control using the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines; patients received SLIT according to the results over a period of 1 year and were clinically reassessed monthly. In addition, for the recruited candidates, the initial total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were measured and pulmonary function tests were performed at the time of recruitment and repeated after 6 months and 1 year of the initiation of the course of SLIT. SLIT was stopped for asthmatic patients during acute exacerbation and resumed after complete asthma control. Results There was a statistically significant decrease in blood eosinophils but a statistically insignificant decrease in total IgE 1 year after SLIT in both groups. Results of specific IgE to food and inhalants revealed that there was statistically significant reduction in the number of allergens in both groups 1 year after SLIT. Results of the skin prick test revealed similar results. Our results revealed that the scores of, both Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma and GINA had improved in all patients after 1 year of continuous therapy. Conclusion SLIT is a safe treatment strategy that significantly reduces symptoms and medication requirements and improves asthma control in both asthmatic patients with and without allergic rhinitis. SLIT using multiple allergens lowered the allergen burden in both asthmatic patients with and those without allergic rhinitis. Level of evidence 1b (Clinical Decision Rule tested within one clinical center).

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded206    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal