• Users Online: 229
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 317-321

Evaluation of facial nerve course, posterior tympanotomy width and visibility of round window in patients with cochlear implantation by performing oblique sagittal cut computed tomographic scan temporal bone


Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Tarek A Hamdy
6 M, Square 1224, Elnoor Street, Sheraton Heliopolis, Cairo
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1012-5574.144963

Rights and Permissions

Background Posterior tympanotomy is a well-known otologic procedure that allows surgeons access to the middle ear cavity. During posterior tympanotomy the surgeon can approach the round window niche and promontory, where a cochleostomy is carried out for cochlear implant electrode array insertion. The mastoid segment of the facial nerve and the chorda tympani nerve could be injured in cases of narrow facial recess or inadequate posterior tympanotomy. With the image reconstruction in an oblique sagittal plane and curve reconstructions, the whole tympanic and mastoid segments of the facial nerve can be visualized in just one image. It is necessary to preoperatively estimate both the facial nerve status and the anatomical relationships between the facial recess and the round window, this may reduce the risk of facial nerve injury and influence the decision on which side to implant, which approach to use and whether to enter the cochlea via cochleostomy or round window membrane route. Objectives The aim of our study is to evaluate the facial nerve (course and anomalies), visibility of the round window membrane and the width of posterior tympanotomy before cochlear implantation by using oblique sagittal cuts CT scan temporal bone. Methods A prospective study; done on 18 consecutive patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss who are candidates for cochlear implantation in Ain Shams University Hospitals during years 2011 & 2012. We focused on oblique sagittal cut CT scan & its role to evaluate the course of facial nerve, posterior tympanotomy width and visibility of the round window. Results We tried to make a statistical correlation between CT scan and intraoperative findings. Statistically significant positive correlation between posterior tympanotomy width and 2nd genu angle, distance from facial bony canal to round window and distance from facial nerve to round window. The mean distance from facial bony canal to round window was longer in operatively viewed round window than non-viewed window (4.7 and 4.4 mm respectively) (P < 0.05). The mean distance from facial nerve to round window was longer in operatively viewed round window membrane than non-viewed window (5.9 and 5.5 mm respectively) (P < 0.05). The mean width of posterior tympanotomy was wider in operatively viewed round window niche than non-viewed window niche (3.1 and 3.0 mm respectively) (P < 0.01). Conclusion Oblique sagittal cuts CT scan temporal bone is very helpful preoperative radiological tool for evaluation of the facial nerve course and anatomical factors that may determine the field of view or the accessibility of the posterior tympanotomy for either cochleostomy or round window membrane approach. Other approaches can be used with more safety when the position of the facial nerve prevents an adequate posterior tympanotomy.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3420    
    Printed56    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded344    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal